The Agency assigned a sole
or major "actor." But there was no written testimony
from such an important person.
The Agency's Order failed to
reveal when and how fraudulent documents were fabricated. Respondent committed
per se defamation in retaliation for filing a claim. The Agency's Investigation
Report reiterated several false statements as uncontested facts although
there was written contest inside the Agency.
Defendant failed to appear
in Federal District Court within 20 days, In default Defendant filed a
motion arguing Court lacked jurisdiction. On May 4 defendants defied the
Court Order to file an ANSWER, and filed
another motion to dismiss instead, which was in violation of Rule 6(d) and 12(g)
On May 6, 2004 the Court
indicated there would be a ruling. On October 22, 2004 the
Court ordered to serve Cook County a summons. Ruling is withheld.
On November 22, the Court
issued an order, again, demanded defendant to file ANSWER.
